Skip to content
Chronicle

Search History Omakase

Start typing to search.

    Read Ii Naosuke Is Killed outside Sakurada Gate

    Read the article below. Interactive reading tools are available when scripts load.

    Overview

    Ii Naosuke Is Killed outside Sakurada Gate

    On the third day of the third month of the Japanese calendar in 1860, attackers struck Ii Naosuke’s procession outside Sakurada Gate in falling snow. Seventeen had left the Mito domain; Arimura Jizaemon came from Satsuma. Seki Tetsunosuke directed the operation. Ii was killed at the entrance to the castle he served.

    The plan grew from disputes over succession, treaty approval and the Ansei Purge. Mito opponents also resisted the shogunate’s demand to return the imperial decree sent to their domain. Coordination with a Satsuma participant turned those disputes into an organized attack; it was not an action ordered by the entire Mito domain.

    Hasuda Ichigorō, one of the assailants, was wounded and then presented the attackers’ statement at a senior councilor’s residence. While held in another lord’s custody, he drew the clash at retainers’ request; he was executed the following year. That surviving record preserves a participant’s account of the violence. The killing removed Ii, while the continuing sequence of assassinations shows that it did not resolve the regime’s political conflict.

    Sources and notes

    1. テロの時代 · National Archives of Japan
    2. 桜田門外之変図 · Ibaraki Prefectural Library

    About these sources

    Back

    1860 | Ii Naosuke Is Killed outside Sakurada Gate桜田門外の変

    The Kojiki in an open-book still life

    Ii Naosuke Is Killed outside Sakurada Gate

    On the third day of the third month of the Japanese calendar in 1860, attackers struck Ii Naosuke’s procession outside Sakurada Gate in falling snow. Seventeen had left the Mito domain; Arimura Jizaemon came from Satsuma. Seki Tetsunosuke directed the operation. Ii was killed at the entrance to the castle he served.

    The plan grew from disputes over succession, treaty approval and the Ansei Purge. Mito opponents also resisted the shogunate’s demand to return the imperial decree sent to their domain. Coordination with a Satsuma participant turned those disputes into an organized attack; it was not an action ordered by the entire Mito domain.

    Hasuda Ichigorō, one of the assailants, was wounded and then presented the attackers’ statement at a senior councilor’s residence. While held in another lord’s custody, he drew the clash at retainers’ request; he was executed the following year. That surviving record preserves a participant’s account of the violence. The killing removed Ii, while the continuing sequence of assassinations shows that it did not resolve the regime’s political conflict.

    Sources and notes ViewHide
    1. [1]

      テロの時代National Archives of Japan

    2. [2]

      桜田門外之変図Ibaraki Prefectural Library

    Reading context

    Reading preferences

    Text size
    Glossary intensity

    Choose how much explanation appears as you read.

    Saved on this device. All terms remain available in the glossary.

    Browse the glossary →
    History Omakase

    Opening reading…