HO Guides
Nagaoka Palace: Government Before Completion
Food requests, changing residences, and the practical work of governing from a capital that was still being built.
Quick · About 2 min
The story in five points
A short route through the argument. Follow a point into Classic for its context and sources.
The capital worked before it was finished
The government redirected taxes and workers’ supplies to Nagaoka in 784, reused buildings brought from Naniwa, and held an audience in 785. These actions established usable arrangements without certifying completion of every palace or city facility.
Read in contextCeremony required practical preparation
Excavations identify a ceremonial compound following Naniwa precedents and postholes interpreted as banner supports. Reused forms and prepared ground made court assembly possible; the surviving remains locate that activity without restoring its participants or an intact eighth-century hall.
Read in contextSmall requests reveal supporting government offices
Wooden tablets connect food requests with the Council of State’s kitchen and accounting establishment. Labels, incoming rice and salt, and named requests show how an office outside the main enclosure helped sustain the people conducting government business.
Read in contextThe court contained changing household establishments
Kammu moved into a second residence in 789 while development continued. The crown prince’s separate support office handled food, crafts and documents, showing why a single finished plan or genealogical chart cannot capture the court’s working requirements.
Read in contextDeparture also proceeded in stages
Temporary accommodation allowed Kammu to remain while palace dismantling began in 793. Markets moved before the final transfer to Heian in 794, so abandoning the capital was a sequence of practical arrangements rather than every function stopping on one day.
Read in context
Opening
A narrow wooden tablet from Nagaoka-kyō requests food for scribes. The amount is four shō, a measure of volume. The writer gives a day in the tenth month and the name Yakumo. There is no account of imperial policy, no description of a palace, and no warning that the capital will soon be abandoned.[1]
The request survives from an office serving the Council of State. It belongs to the ordinary business of keeping people at work in the capital between 784 and 794, when the court occupied Nagaoka before moving to Heian-kyō. That working establishment had ceremonial halls, stores, residences, and supporting offices. It also kept changing while officials were using it.[2]
The excavated palace core, now within the city of Mukō, makes that overlap unusually clear. Government did not wait for a final plan to be completed. It occupied usable buildings, shifted activities into new ones, and eventually made arrangements to continue while the palace was being dismantled. The ten-year capital is a history of successive accommodations, rather than one construction project followed by one departure.
1. Redirecting a government's supplies
The move began by changing where resources went. In 784, shortly after appointing officials to build Nagaoka, the government ordered that the year's chō and yō taxes, together with supplies for construction workers, should be sent to the new palace. These were obligations delivered in goods or in substitution for labor, not simply money deposited in a treasury.[3]
The destination mattered before all the buildings existed. A new palace required materials to build with and food for people working there. Changing the delivery address began drawing those resources toward Nagaoka while the court was still moving out of its previous arrangements. The order made the project a destination in the country's administrative life, as well as a place on which construction had begun.
The palace was only one part of the intended capital. Its ceremonial and governmental compounds, together with the emperor's residence, formed a core enclosed by substantial earthen walls. The broader city included other offices, households, and commercial activity. The palace core lies within modern Mukō; it should not be confused with the boundaries of today's neighboring city of Nagaokakyō.[4]
Reused buildings helped the new establishment become usable. The local museum describes structures dismantled at Naniwa, in the Osaka area, and brought along the Yodo River for reassembly at Nagaoka.[4] The choice of a connected site and the availability of existing architecture worked together. Transport could move construction material, while dismantling preserved some of the investment already made in it.
This did not make the entire undertaking instantaneous. Transferred buildings still had to take their places within newly prepared compounds, and the government's different activities required more than a single finished hall. What it offered was a way to establish important parts of a working center without waiting for every component to be produced anew.
The emperor moved to Nagaoka in 784. A New Year audience followed at the Daigokuden, the principal ceremonial hall, in 785.[5] The sequence puts the capital into use early. It does not provide a completion certificate for everything behind its walls.
2. A court takes its place
The ceremonial core joined the Daigokuden to the Chōdōin, a compound of halls and courts used for official assembly. Its arrangement is known through excavations spread across the modern town. In 1955, historical geographer and teacher Nakayama Shūichi, working with his former pupil Sodeoka Masakiyo, found the compound's south gate after following a report of cut stone discovered during railway-station construction.[6]
Later investigations established more of the surrounding halls. The discovery of the western fourth hall in 1982 was particularly important: it showed that this compound's arrangement and scale followed the later Naniwa palace, rather than the ceremonial complexes at Nara's Heijō palace or at Heian.[6] Nagaoka's place between those two capitals in a chronology had not dictated its architectural model.
The material transfer described in the museum's history consequently has a spatial counterpart. Buildings brought from elsewhere belonged to a composition with precedents elsewhere. At the new site, inherited forms helped provide a recognizable setting in which the court could gather. Reuse involved an arrangement for activities, not merely a supply of timber.
The foreground of the principal hall adds a smaller piece of evidence about that use. Excavation in 1997 found substantial postholes interpreted as supports for ceremonial banners. Their regular spacing and subsidiary post traces supported the identification. The national heritage account relates them to New Year audiences at Nagaoka, where no imperial accession ceremony took place.[7]
A ceremony therefore required preparation in the ground as well as a hall above it. Posts needed supports; a line of banners required an ordered position in relation to the building. The preserved holes recover part of that practical setting without giving us the faces of the people assembled before it.
Nor is the broad platform an intact eighth-century building. The Daigokuden's foundation stones were lost; traces of paving and tuff helped establish the dimensions of its platform.[7] The remains locate the ceremonial center through what was left below and around it. From there, the less monumental office tablet leads into another part of the same working capital.
3. The council had a kitchen—and accounts
The food request came from the eastern city, outside the palace's main enclosure. Excavated wooden documents identify the establishment there as the kitchen office attached to the Council of State. Its work extended to receiving, storing, and accounting for revenues that supported the council.[8]
Mukō's historical account describes rice and salt arriving as rents from land. Clerks checked the goods against wooden labels and recorded them. Requests for scribes' food formed part of the same documentary activity. The surviving tablets show an office concerned both with what came in and with what should be issued for people doing its work.[8]
The little request signed Yakumo belongs to this second movement. It identifies a purpose—food for scribes—and an amount. The date and name make it something more usable than an anonymous statement that supplies are needed. A recipient could recognize the request as one made on a particular occasion. Whether this individual request was granted is not recorded on the tablet.
A second tablet, dated in 789, asks for four shō for scribes and again carries the name Yakumo. Its transcription also preserves repeated numerals, units, and fragments of formal expressions; the database classifies the piece as both a document and writing practice.[9] Alongside a request for supplies, the wood retains work on the written forms through which official business was conducted. The record does not establish who practiced on it or whether the practice preceded the request.
This also gives the palace a reach beyond its enclosing wall. The council's work depended on an establishment in the surrounding city that could receive and account for supplies. A diagram containing only the grand halls would omit an operating part of government. The connection is demonstrable through the office's name and documents, rather than an assumption that every nearby building served the palace.
The work left an unexpectedly intimate record. Official writing that once concerned a modest quantity of food now reveals a continuing establishment from which the buildings themselves have disappeared. Its value lies less in making a general point that officials needed to eat than in showing how that need entered an identifiable office's paperwork, on repeated occasions, at a particular city address.
4. A second residence inside the same capital
Several years after the move, the palace was still unfinished. An edict of 788, reproduced in Mukō's chronology, acknowledged both continuing construction and the burdens of requisition imposed on the population. Tax relief accompanied that acknowledgment.[10] The government was operating from a place whose further making continued to require resources from outside it.
The following year brought a substantial change within the palace. Emperor Kammu moved from the western residence to a new eastern one. A wooden document identifies an office concerned with constructing the Eastern Great Palace, and the chronology connects this work with the new residence occupied in 789.[11]
Archaeology supplies the other side of that record. Investigations beginning in 1966 found corners of the residence's enclosing wall and covered corridor. From these discoveries, excavators located the central hall, a large building supported on posts set into the ground. Its configuration and roof-tile evidence led them to identify it with the eastern residence recorded for 789.[11]
Finding the enclosure before the principal building mattered to that identification. A substantial hall by itself could have served several kinds of establishment. The surrounding boundaries placed it within a controlled residential compound. Its position, form, and associated objects could then be considered together with the written record of the emperor's move.
The result changes how a reconstructed plan should be read. The eastern residence was not necessarily the place in which the emperor had lived throughout Nagaoka's decade. The capital had acquired a different domestic center while retaining its name. A single finished-looking plan can obscure this sequence by presenting facilities from different stages as though every relationship had been settled in 784.
Nor did the new residence remove the need for other premises. Ceremonial assembly, council business, and the emperor's household were related activities, but they were not interchangeable. A usable audience hall did not make every household requirement complete. The second residence shows the palace being developed around activities that had already begun, with government continuing during that development.
5. The heir needed an establishment of his own
East of the emperor's residence, another group of discoveries identifies the arrangements for the crown prince. During investigations in 1996–1998, archaeologists recovered discarded material carrying the name Tōgūbō, the office supporting the heir's official and everyday life. The excavators associate this establishment with Prince Ate, Kammu's son and the later Emperor Heizei.[12]
A crown prince on a genealogical chart appears as one person waiting in a line of succession. The finds give that position a working establishment. Inscribed material names offices concerned with food and craft production. Amber, tortoiseshell, and ivory offcuts indicate the manufacture of decorated objects. The assemblage places skilled work within the provision of the prince's household, rather than leaving it as an invisible service supplied from nowhere.[12]
Written material served several purposes there. One small wooden label reads tokudo-mon, documents concerning Buddhist ordination, and carries a date in 792.[13] Its brevity is the point. The label could identify a category of papers without reproducing all their contents. It preserves part of an arrangement for keeping documents usable, not the full business recorded in the missing papers.
The distinction between a label and a request becomes revealing when this piece is set beside Yakumo's food tablet. One named a body of documentation; the other asked for an issue of supplies. Writing supported different operations within the palace's associated establishments. The surviving words are short because they once worked inside contexts in which their readers already knew much more.
The crown prince's office must also be kept separate from the emperor's Eastern Palace. Their Japanese names can look confusingly similar in discussions of the site, but they refer here to different establishments. Archaeology places the heir's support office east of the emperor's residence, rather than identifying the same building twice.
Together, the second imperial residence and the prince's office show why “the court moved” is a compressed description. The imperial household contained more than one person with institutional requirements. Accommodating it involved premises, supplies, objects, and documents that had to function in relation to one another.
6. A crisis did not bring construction to an immediate end
The decade's best-known political rupture came early. Fujiwara no Tanetsugu, an official directing construction, was assassinated in 785. In the ensuing crisis, Crown Prince Sawara, Kammu's brother, was deposed and confined. He refused food and died while being sent away. Ate subsequently became crown prince.[14]
These events affected succession at a capital still under construction. They also acquired a religious aftermath. The city's chronology records that divination in 792 attributed the illness of the new crown prince to Sawara's angry spirit. The same year brought flooding and damage to government buildings.[14] The attribution belongs to the court's recorded explanation of illness; it is not a supernatural finding adopted here.
The sequence deserves attention because several years of institutional development lie between the assassination and the eventual move. The council's office had been put into use, the eastern residence had been occupied, and the heir's establishment was handling its own affairs. A narrative that moves directly from Tanetsugu's death to abandonment removes much of what the archaeology is recovering.
The same evidence prevents the ongoing work from becoming proof that all was well. The acknowledgment of requisition burdens in 788 and the later records of illness and flooding belong to the capital's active years. Building and governing could continue under pressures that the continuation itself did not resolve.
Why the court ultimately chose another site remains a question with more than one proposed explanation. The local museum presents political crisis, beliefs concerning Sawara, and flooding among the relevant accounts, rather than identifying one demonstrated cause.[4] Their presence need not be erased to recover Nagaoka's working life. They need to be placed within it.
For the palace, the consequential next step was practical as well as political. Leaving required new accommodation while existing structures were taken down. The court could not simply cease to be a household or a government for the duration of another building project.
7. Moving out before everything stopped
In 793, Kammu moved to an establishment called the Tōin so that work could proceed on dismantling the palace. Construction at the next capital was under way that year. The markets moved in 794, before the emperor's transfer to Heian-kyō.[15] Departure, like arrival, consisted of stages affecting different parts of the city.
The temporary residence is particularly instructive. The court could give up its principal buildings while continuing to occupy accommodation in the capital it was leaving. Dismantling and residence overlapped. The date of the final imperial move therefore cannot stand for the day on which every building ceased to function or every person changed address.
Identifying those establishments on the ground has required further distinctions. A large detached-palace complex excavated east of the main residence in 1991 was initially associated with the Tōin. Its scale and position made that interpretation plausible. Later, pottery inscribed “Tōin” was found at another detached-palace site. The archaeological center now regards the first identification as unlikely; the excavated complex remains a palace establishment whose exact historical name is unresolved.[16]
This revision is productive because it leaves substantial knowledge intact. A large complex was found, its arrangement investigated, and its character recognized. What changed was the name attached to it. The city's short occupation did not mean that it contained only one establishment large enough to be mistaken for the recorded temporary residence.
The scattered remains consequently preserve a more active history than one abandoned plan. Ceremonial halls established an early place of assembly. A council office handled incoming revenues and repeated requests for food. A new imperial residence changed the household's position; the heir had a supporting establishment of his own. Finally, another residence allowed the court to remain while dismantling began.
The little food tablet belongs within that sequence. It was written because there was work to continue on a particular day, not because the capital had reached a final architectural state. Nagaoka's government occupied arrangements that were usable while others were still being made—and arranged to leave before all its existing premises had stopped being useful. Its decade was short, but it contained more than one version of a capital at work.
Next topic · HO Guides
Rokuhara: The Temple and the Government Next Door
An earlier preacher, a warrior administration, and the different work performed by images and documents in one Kyoto neighborhood.
Continue readingSources and NotesView sourcesHide sources
Materials were consulted on 16 September 2026. Historical month-and-day references retain the Japanese calendar; none is silently presented as a Western date. Wooden texts are used through the identified transcriptions and catalog descriptions. Excavation findings are reported through the investigating institution's accounts, not a claim to have reanalyzed excavation plans, measured the sites, or read every underlying report. Modern parks and markers are not described as standing eighth-century halls.
- [1]
Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Mokkanko, record MS003011000024, wooden tablet no. 13, transcription 「請書工食四升十月二日八雲」, https://mokkanko.nabunken.go.jp/ja/MS003011000024 . The complete catalog fields were retrieved in readable search-index text; direct-page access failed. They identify a cypress tablet, 234 × 26 × 2 millimeters, from Nagaoka-kyō Left Capital, third avenue, second ward, eighth block, investigation L13, feature SD1301B. The personal-name field gives 八雲, possibly 台八雲; only Yakumo is used in the narrative, without supplying an unverified reading of the family name. The day is given without a year. Four shō is not converted to modern liters or a number of meals, and the request is not treated as proof of delivery. The database supplies no image for this entry.
Return to the reference ↑ - [2]
Mukō City, 「都の10年」, section 「書く 役人と官人」, https://www.city.muko.kyoto.jp/site/rekishi/1075.html ; Mukō City Cultural Museum, 「向日市と長岡宮跡」, opening description of the capital and palace, https://www.city.muko.kyoto.jp/site/shiryokan/1738.html . They connect the council's supporting office to the tablet locality and distinguish the 784–794 city from its palace core. Neither page's conjectural population totals or reconstructions of private motives are used.
Return to the reference ↑ - [3]
Mukō City, 「長岡京略年表」, Enryaku 3 (784), sixth-month tenth- and thirteenth-day entries, https://www.city.muko.kyoto.jp/site/rekishi/1070.html ; 「都の10年」, 「納める 税制度」, URL in note 2. See the chronology and the full relevant tax-history section. Used for the appointment, redirection of taxes and building-worker supplies, and the kinds of obligation represented by chō and yō. The discussion of the consequences for officials' private willingness to move is the city's interpretation and is not adopted. The ancient administrative order itself was not independently collated with Shoku Nihongi.
Return to the reference ↑ - [4]
Mukō City Cultural Museum, 「向日市と長岡宮跡」, complete historical discussion, URL in note 2. Used for the palace core in modern Mukō, the wider city, Naniwa building transfers by the Yodo River, and the acknowledged plurality of explanations for departure. The account's “six months” concerns the central area, not every facility of the finished capital; this essay does not claim that all construction ended in 784. Its proposed secret planning and psychological explanation are omitted. Exact outer-city dimensions are also omitted because the archaeological center identifies unresolved questions concerning the city's extent.
Return to the reference ↑ - [5]
Mukō City, 「長岡京略年表」, 784 eleventh-month eleventh-day entry and 785 first-month first-day entry, URL in note 3. Used as the city's chronological synopsis. The imperial move and New Year audience are different events; their dates do not certify completion of the whole palace.
Return to the reference ↑ - [6]
Mukō City Center for Archaeological Operations, 「朝堂院(朝堂院公園)」, complete investigation history, https://mukoumaibun.or.jp/sites/post-113/ . It identifies the 1955 south-gate discovery by Nakayama and Sodeoka and the importance of the western fourth hall excavated in 1982 for recognizing the later-Naniwa arrangement and scale. The linked illustration was not used to reconstruct individual participants' positions. The claim concerns this ceremonial compound, not identity of the entire Nagaoka and Naniwa capitals.
Return to the reference ↑ - [7]
Agency for Cultural Affairs, 「長岡宮跡」, Cultural Heritage Online record 205773, initial designation description and entry H10-12-044 concerning the 1997 banner-post investigation, https://online.bunka.go.jp/heritages/detail/205773 . They distinguish the lost Daigokuden foundation stones, the surviving platform evidence, and three excavated postholes interpreted as part of a seven-support arrangement. Association with New Year ceremony is an archaeological interpretation; no particular year's banner installation is independently identified. The record aggregates designation texts from different dates and contains an inconsistent general designation-year statement in the later entry; that incidental date is not used.
Return to the reference ↑ - [8]
Mukō City, 「都の10年」, 「書く 役人と官人」, especially the paragraph beginning 「長岡京左京三条二坊八町」, URL in note 2; Mukō City Cultural Museum, 「常設展示」, passage on the Daijōkan Chūke and wooden documents, https://www.city.muko.kyoto.jp/site/shiryokan/1734.html . It identifies the office's location, revenue-storage and accounting functions, rice and salt, checks against labels, and food requests. The second account belongs to the same local research tradition and is not counted as an independent excavation. No complete daily ledger, payroll, or uniform staffing total was obtained.
Return to the reference ↑ - [9]
Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Mokkanko, record MS003011000023, tablet no. 11, https://mokkanko.nabunken.go.jp/ja/MS003011000023 . See the complete indexed catalog entry, including both transcribed text groups and the classification 「文書・習書」. The food-request text is 「請書手飯肆升○延暦八年十月十日台八雲」; the other group includes repeated numerals, units, and formal expressions. The record supplies the year 789 and the same L13 / SD1301B excavation provenance as the opening tablet. The two individual pieces remain distinct. No image is supplied, and the sequence of writing or identity of the person practicing is not established. See the broader database index for related food requests: https://mokkanko.nabunken.go.jp/ja/?c=index&limit=16&page=458 .
Return to the reference ↑ - [10]
Mukō City, 「長岡京略年表」, 788 ninth-month twenty-sixth-day entry, URL in note 3. The reproduced edict passage acknowledges unfinished palace buildings, increasing construction, and requisition burdens, followed by tax reduction. This limited passage was read in the chronology; the complete original edict was not independently read. Neither the amount of relief nor its measured effect on households is asserted.
Return to the reference ↑ - [11]
Mukō City Center for Archaeological Operations, 「東宮 第二次内裏(旧上田家住宅・南内裏公園・内裏公園)」, complete investigation account, https://mukoumaibun.or.jp/sites/post-116/ ; Mukō City, chronology, 789 first-month seventeenth-day and second-month twenty-seventh-day entries, URL in note 3. The center connects the excavated enclosure, central post-built hall, and tile evidence to the Eastern Palace in Shoku Nihongi; the chronology identifies the building office through a tablet from Left Capital investigation 51, no. 216. That tablet's full individual record was not independently read. The narrative distinguishes the emperor's second residence from the crown prince's support office and does not reconstruct a missing first-residence plan.
Return to the reference ↑ - [12]
Mukō City Center for Archaeological Operations, 「春宮坊(かしのき公園)」, complete account, https://mukoumaibun.or.jp/sites/post-117/ . Inscribed discarded material supports identification of the office, its location east of the imperial residence, and service to Prince Ate. The named craft and food offices and worked-material offcuts support local household provisioning and production. The account does not identify every completed object, individual maker, or precise workstation. Discarded paperwork is not assumed to have remained where each document was originally written.
Return to the reference ↑ - [13]
Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Mokkanko, record MK020061000126, transcription 「得度文/十一年五月廿日」, https://mokkanko.nabunken.go.jp/ja/MK020061000126 . The complete relevant catalog fields were retrieved in indexed text; direct access failed. The record classifies the piece as a document label and dates it to Enryaku 11 (792), from palace investigation 329, ditch SD32901 in the eastern office area associated with the crown prince. The lost documents, their subjects' names, and the exact relation between ordination and the prince's household were not reconstructed. No claim that this one label proves a general religious policy is made.
Return to the reference ↑ - [14]
Mukō City, 「長岡京略年表」, 785 ninth-month twenty-third-day and following crisis entry, eleventh-month twenty-fifth-day entry; 792 sixth-month tenth-day, sixth-month twenty-second-day, and eighth-month flood entries, URL in note 3. They record the assassination, Sawara's removal and death, Ate's appointment, the reported divination, and physical disasters. The record of an accusation is not a judgment establishing Sawara's responsibility for the murder. Divination is evidence of an attributed explanation of illness, not supernatural causation or proof of the emperor's complete reasons for moving.
Return to the reference ↑ - [15]
Mukō City, 「長岡京略年表」, 793 first-month twenty-first-day and third-month construction entries; 794 seventh-month first-day and tenth-month twenty-second-day entries, URL in note 3. Mukō City Cultural Museum, 「常設展示」, discussion of the Tōin as temporary residence during palace removal, URL in note 8. They distinguish temporary residence, dismantling, construction elsewhere, market transfer, and the final imperial move. No claim is made that all functions transferred on one day or that every dismantled member was reused in a specifically identified Heian building.
Return to the reference ↑ - [16]
Mukō City Center for Archaeological Operations, 「離宮」, complete account of the 1991–1994 investigation and subsequent change of attribution, https://mukoumaibun.or.jp/sites/post-119/ . The center explains why a substantial eastern complex was initially associated with the Tōin and why inscribed pottery from another villa site weakened that identification. The first site's architectural interpretation as a detached palace remains; its particular historical name is unresolved. The pottery inscription is used through the excavating institution's account, not a firsthand reading of the object. This discussion remains part of interpreting the capital's palace establishments, not a separate modern attraction or an added Place.
Return to the reference ↑